<!--
.. title: Typing is Thinking
.. slug: typing-is-thinking
.. date: 2021-07-21 08:28:34 UTC-07:00
.. tags: psychology, creativity, technology
.. category: 
.. link: 
.. description: 
.. type: text
.. previewimage: /images/person_typing_on_laptop.jpg
-->

You probably type a lot.

It's a pretty strange thing, considered historically. Rather than interact
directly, we serialize our thoughts and send or broadcast them (often lossily
and asynchronously). In the past, written correspondence was an occasional
luxury, used for special purposes and communiques. Now it is our default mode,
how humans reach one another for work, family, friendship, and more.

The modern ubiquity of literacy is a societal boon and equalizer - but the
accompanying commoditization of communication has had unexpected side effects.
We produce and consume - materially and ideologically - yet despite the
prodigious growth of production, consumption has become so automatic as to
outpace it for most individuals.

But this post is not yet another consideration of "doomscrolling" (see my
[previous post](/posts/we-select-our-distractions/) if interested). This post is
about the creative side of the equation, and will hopefully encourage you to
consider and create a bit more yourself.

<!-- TEASER_END -->

![Person with laptop and smartphone](/images/person_typing_on_laptop.jpg)

Consider this excerpt from a
[letter sent during the American Civil War](https://content.lib.washington.edu/civilwarweb/index.html):

> "The battle has been raging all day in the distance and I am unable to ascertain whether any thing has been gained or not. O how I long for this war to end. How I long for peace. How will I hail the day when I return to the bosom of my family. My Dear I hope to see you."

> -- Samuel D. Lougheed letter to his wife Jane "Jennie" Lougheed, April 30 - May 1 1863

Compare this to how
[Jack Dorsey described the naming of Twitter](https://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/02/twitter-creator.html):

> ...we came across the word 'twitter', and it was just perfect. The definition was 'a short burst of inconsequential information,' and 'chirps from birds'. And that's exactly what the product was.

Tweets have come to have consequence, but it's still pretty hard to cram much
information in them. Due to their brevity they rely on implicit (often tribal)
context, and along with most modern writing are intensely casual. Skimmed and
usually ignored, tweets and their ilk compete for noticeability with
inflammatory appeals rather than studied signal.

There is a fairly solid economics-style argument for this - in the past,
writing "supply" (opportunities, resources, time, literacy, mediums, venues)
was scarce, and so when it did occur it was given higher value (more time and
consideration). Now, most of us have ample opportunity (and even obligation) to
write - and so each single instance of it has relatively less value.

This is fair, and not an entirely bad thing (again it's great that literacy is
widespread and a greater variety of stories can be told). But - thinking is not
fungible. That is, you can't always trade one "deep thinking" event for a bunch
of "light thinking" events and get equivalent results. Yet that is essentially
what we do with our writing habits, especially when social media is layered on.

We lose something when we always write without depth and focus. Composing,
reviewing, editing, and iterating refines not just our words but our thoughts.
Taking time and using single-purpose tools - tactile physical keyboards, pencil
and paper, even typewriters - forces us to invest in thought, and that pays
dividends.

How can we reclaim that value in a society where we are so overloaded with the
written word that it predictively glides off our fingers onto a general purpose
exobrain (cell phone)? The answer here isn't "tweets bad, blogs good." The
answer is more in the spirit of improv -
"[yes, and...](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yes%2C_and...)"

Long writing has value. Short writing does too - rarely in an informational
sense, but rather as a way to build bonds and socialize. That social media has
weaponized this to the point that it dominates the communicative ecosystem
doesn't mean it is worthless - its success is testament to an underlying merit.
But as is often the case, an ecosystem where one thing dominates at the expense
of all else is one that is unstable, and ultimately bad for all concerned.

Tweet, chat, communicate off-the-cuff (though sometimes it is wise for that to
also be off the record) - but also plan and write a blog, a diary, or even just
a well-written email or document for work. Exercise both your social and
pensive side - in the long run, you may even find them complementary.
